Post(s) tagged with "strategy"

Does Your Strategy Match Your Competitive Environment? - Martin Reeves - Harvard Business Review
In our recent research, we’ve found that fully three-quarters of the executives we surveyed at 120 companies around the world in 10 major industry sectors were well aware of the need to match their strategies — and the process by which they create them — to the specific conditions of their competitive environment. And yet, our research also found far too many were employing strategies suited only for predictable and immutable industries.
No I am unfortunately NOT surprised by this, but neither depressed… since this seems to be way it have to go i e companies don’t change and do consequently go bust and leave room for others… or?

Does Your Strategy Match Your Competitive Environment? - Martin Reeves - Harvard Business Review

In our recent research, we’ve found that fully three-quarters of the executives we surveyed at 120 companies around the world in 10 major industry sectors were well aware of the need to match their strategies — and the process by which they create them — to the specific conditions of their competitive environment. And yet, our research also found far too many were employing strategies suited only for predictable and immutable industries.

No I am unfortunately NOT surprised by this, but neither depressed… since this seems to be way it have to go i e companies don’t change and do consequently go bust and leave room for others… or?

Source: blogs.hbr.org

Culture Eats Strategy For Lunch | Fast Company ⇢

Culture, like brand, is misunderstood and often discounted as a touchy-feely component of business that belongs to HR. It’s not intangible or fluffy, it’s not a vibe or the office décor. It’s one of the most important drivers that has to be set or adjusted to push long-term, sustainable success. It’s not good enough just to have an amazing product and a healthy bank balance. Long-term success is dependent on a culture that is nurtured and alive. Culture is the environment in which your strategy and your brand thrives or dies a slow death.

I would say this even stronger: culture is what is implemented in the organization and in the head of the employees while strategies, plans and organization charts are incomplete and one dimensional sketches of what we want the organization to be. The problem is that we think that we can bypass the concept of culture to get directly from these sketchy plans to changed organizational behavior, when in fact the changed culture is what we really want to achieve.

The Rise of Digital Civilizations Will Define Our Post-PC Future « if connected ⇢

These great digital powers [Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and maybe Microsoft] are now building Digital Civilizations, rather than a series of mere products, individual platforms or even ecosystems (around a platform). They are pursuing strategies that reach far beyond the confines of existing markets. They are causing widespread market collisions as they push industries to overlap, merge or cease to exist. They are outflanking and disrupting companies that follow less ambitious corporate strategies.
These new Digital Civilizations use identity to tie numerous disparate products, many devices, multiple platforms and product portfolios together into their long term strategy. Each Civilization has hundreds of millions of active users — often with credit cards attached — far more than even the largest telecom operators or media companies. They straddle industries rather than operating within legacy market sectors. They have an organizing ideology underlying their strategy that motivates and attracts talented employees, excites partners, and is the foundation for the marketing that entices users to become their customers.

This is an interesting analysis of what is going on… Well worth reading and thinking about!



  Forrester: Most Companies Still Figuring Out Mobile 



To me this is really interesting since it is a(nother) piece of evidence of the challenges of adapting a new organizational paradigm from, in this case a model where people and their communication capababilities are location based, to a model where people are mobile and bring their communications capabilities with them. 

In a broader and a more generic perspective of technology adaption/diffusion it is yet another example of how bad organizations are at digesting new technologies and new logic of organizing. 

Especially if it doesn’t directly make it on the bottom line…

And now to a thought exercise: how large share of the changes which are required of companies today will directly contribute to the bottom line in 1 - 2 years…? 

My view of this is that the lion part of the required changes, e g adapting to a mobile logic, will never be directly contributing to the bottom line. Instead it will create a whole new set of systemic challenges like e g inertia, inability to ser, understand or respond which in turn will cause a long row of complex problems on both operational and soon also strategic levels. In the worst of worlds this might turn out to be THE, or at least A SIGNIFICANT reason that the set of operational options for the future will be severely limited, which in turn might be extremely damaging to the future valuation (= share value) of the company. But it will still never appear to affect the bottom line…

…though it might kill you directly like falling of a cliff when failing to react to some changes in the environment, or slowly paralyze you like a deadly neurological disease when you sit immobilized and step by step realize that you are losing your capacity and will soon not be able to defend yourself against a toddler. But it will still not affect the bottom line.

Forrester: Most Companies Still Figuring Out Mobile

To me this is really interesting since it is a(nother) piece of evidence of the challenges of adapting a new organizational paradigm from, in this case a model where people and their communication capababilities are location based, to a model where people are mobile and bring their communications capabilities with them.

In a broader and a more generic perspective of technology adaption/diffusion it is yet another example of how bad organizations are at digesting new technologies and new logic of organizing.

Especially if it doesn’t directly make it on the bottom line…

And now to a thought exercise: how large share of the changes which are required of companies today will directly contribute to the bottom line in 1 - 2 years…?

My view of this is that the lion part of the required changes, e g adapting to a mobile logic, will never be directly contributing to the bottom line. Instead it will create a whole new set of systemic challenges like e g inertia, inability to ser, understand or respond which in turn will cause a long row of complex problems on both operational and soon also strategic levels. In the worst of worlds this might turn out to be THE, or at least A SIGNIFICANT reason that the set of operational options for the future will be severely limited, which in turn might be extremely damaging to the future valuation (= share value) of the company. But it will still never appear to affect the bottom line…

…though it might kill you directly like falling of a cliff when failing to react to some changes in the environment, or slowly paralyze you like a deadly neurological disease when you sit immobilized and step by step realize that you are losing your capacity and will soon not be able to defend yourself against a toddler. But it will still not affect the bottom line.

Source: readwriteweb.com

An interesting social media strategy framework from www.athgroup.com

(via @rossdawson)

An interesting social media strategy framework from www.athgroup.com

(via @rossdawson)

Resonance on Vimeo (via Vimeo)

Good video!

They are talking about design strategy in a really good way, but I think this line of reasoning could be applied to a lot more because most of us are actually engaged in a design process, even if we don’t understand it.

Source: http%3A%2F%2Fvimeo.com%2F4167960

From the New York Landmarks Plot to the Mumbai Attack | Stratfor ⇢

According to Stratfor the tactics in Mumbai wasn’t new. In 1993 another group with clear connections to al Qaeda planned to execute very similar attack on New York - now known as the “Landmarks” plot.

Future Tense - CFO Magazine - December 2008 Issue - CFO.com ⇢

The uncertainties after the financial crisis are increasing the use of scenario planning, even if it should have been done before:

But abandoning the prediction game is not an option. Companies are now redoubling their forecasting efforts, even though (and perhaps because) the horizon is brimming with unknowns. In a recent CFO Research survey, 41 percent of senior finance executives said they have strengthened scenario-planning procedures in light of the banking crisis.

Loading more posts

P A Martin Börjesson

To be able to see the future emerge we have to throw a wide net to catch the weak signals. In this tumble I collect things I find valuable for my work as scenario planner, strategist and futurist - for more info about me go to www.futuramb.se.


Ask me about my posts

Connect