In 15 years time, more than 90 percent of news will be written by an algorithm, predicts Kristian Hammond, the CTO and cofounder of Narrative Science.

This robonews tsunami, he insists, will not wash away the remaining human reporters who still collect paychecks. Instead the universe of newswriting will expand dramatically, as computers mine vast troves of data to produce ultracheap, totally readable accounts of events, trends, and developments that no journalist is currently covering.

That’s not to say that computer-generated stories will remain in the margins, limited to producing more and more Little League write-ups and formulaic earnings previews. Hammond was recently asked for his reaction to a prediction that a computer would win a Pulitzer Prize within 20 years. He disagreed. It would happen, he said, in five.

Hammond believes that as Narrative Science grows, its stories will go higher up the journalism food chain—from commodity news to explanatory journalism and, ultimately, detailed long-form articles. Maybe at some point, humans and algorithms will collaborate, with each partner playing to its strength. Computers, with their flawless memories and ability to access data, might act as legmen to human writers. Or vice versa, human reporters might interview subjects and pick up stray details—and then send them to a computer that writes it all up. As the computers get more accomplished and have access to more and more data, their limitations as storytellers will fall away. It might take a while, but eventually even a story like this one could be produced without, well, me. “Humans are unbelievably rich and complex, but they are machines,” Hammond says. “In 20 years, there will be no area in which Narrative Science doesn’t write stories.”

- Can an Algorithm Write a Better News Story Than a Human Reporter? | Gadget Lab | Wired.com (via myserendipities)

26 April 41 infoneer-pulse

FutureNews

Share

Short URL:

Notes

1. fortnightjournal reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
2. sfbdc reblogged this from myserendipities
3. wedgeseeds reblogged this from myserendipities
4. ronnilavi reblogged this from futuramb
5. skhn3 reblogged this from dialectic
6. plomberie-paris likes this
7. aldoholod likes this
8. penguingirl reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
9. atompowers likes this
10. noamibuities reblogged this from myserendipities
11. hyperhetor reblogged this from myserendipities
12. hawkeye39 likes this
13. southcoasthate reblogged this from futuramb
14. phraznikov reblogged this from futuramb
15. phraznikov likes this
16. newsguy777 reblogged this from myserendipities
17. albeitalways likes this
18. danteskartoni likes this
19. techerous reblogged this from futuramb
20. futuramb reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
21. mostoriginalscreenname reblogged this from myserendipities
22. iudicibus reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
23. valswei reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
24. devianta reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
25. novaless reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
26. hakly likes this
27. imall4frogs likes this
28. kevinnuut likes this
29. marionisamuffin likes this
30. badge-boy likes this
31. spazolot reblogged this from infoneer-pulse
32. infoneer-pulse reblogged this from myserendipities
33. flintwest reblogged this from myserendipities
34. realcleverscience likes this
35. This was featured in #Tech
36. wildcat2030 likes this
37. myserendipities posted this